Reading Mikko's thoughts on this card makes me think the card and its cards underneath should be discarded when any play deck is exhausted. However, what would happen if one were to put another TNaA underneath a played TNaA? If a playdeck is exhausted could one then play the second, as yet unplayed TNaA, in response to the deck exhausting or the discarding process, thereby circumventing in some manner the loss of the combo cards?The Nazgul are Abroad
--It was originally suggested that this card be “discarded when a play deck is exhausted” in order to avoid possible abuses of a player thinning out his discard pile with 3 copies of this card and 3 copies of Half an Eye Open (V), then exhausting, then drawing precisely the new cards needed in his hand. The current version utilizes this phrase. Still, I am worried about the card being too weak, especially with this phrase. Consider: a player puts this card down with 3 hazards from the Sideboard. After four turns his opponent hasn’t gone through a Nazgul area yet, but he has hopes the opponent will on his next 2 turns, but now the opponent (or you!) exhausts—and the card, plus the 5 cards underneath it, get shuffled into your play deck! The combo is completely ruined. Thoughts?
--Furthermore, I am thinking that a player should be allowed to play FOUR cards underneath this one. This would encourage more creativity as for what goes under here too, as opposed to just the four most “powerful” or efficient hazards. Should this be allowed for Half and Eye too, or is Half an Eye naturally more powerful?
Regardless, it's a useful trick for both the Dragon and Nazgul varieties to put one of the same cards underneath.
Does this make any difference to how you think about the cards?