Hi all,
after reading through it all again, I am with Eric on this one, to go with version C,
still I believe the CoE is reasonable enough to have no need of control by the voters out there, as most players will not care one way or the other, we just have the feeling that many might care, as some, such as Brian make a big fuss out of everything we deem worthy of a change
Nicolai
charter rewrite: involving the players in the errata process
-
- Council Member
- Posts: 1321
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 10:46 am
- Location: Kempen (Niederrhein) Germany
- Shapeshifter
- Ex Council Member
- Posts: 622
- Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 4:16 pm
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
I would like to see a combination of options "B" and "C". Let's go with "B" first. However, if the total number of voters for an erratum proposal would be below a certain number (less than 50?) option "C" could automatically replace option "B" (for this single vote, only). Too complicated? Well, then we should go with "C".
- Thorsten the Traveller
- Ex Council Chairman
- Posts: 1764
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Tilburg, Netherlands
yep I will edit the current draft then.
Stone-age did not end because man ran out of rocks.