You are welcome to provide any relevant quotes from the Designers to support your conclusions.
What is the hazard player's protection against Withdrawn to Mordor during another company's earlier site phase? Not playing their automatic-attack hazards at all? Shucks, still prone to The Riddle Game. Maybe not putting them in their deck at all? Ok, I admit I'll have to think more about that one.
You mentioned seeing Marvel's Told changed (no actual quotes)... is this your derivation for concluding the Designers intent? One card being changed in a set of unfinished rules for a different edition of the game? Surely there must be more.
You already agreed that this was already allowed in the game, so I'm not sure what you are referencing with the NO.
If you still haven't gotten it from or since the original post, the proposal is to allow the resource player to additionally use the company currently resolving it's site phase to play resource cards that remove a particular automatic-attack (essentially an automatic-attack created by a hazard card). This indeed breaks from the existing rulings; hence why it needs to be a proposal.
Are you trying to bully another person out of "Any community member may create a thread in this forum suggesting a desired rule erratum or clarification?"