Whole Villages Roused and detainment status

The place to ask all rules questions related to MECCG.
Post Reply
User avatar
Konrad Klar
Rules Wizard
Posts: 3282
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 9:35 am
Location: Wałbrzych, Poland

Whole Villages Roused and detainment status

Post by Konrad Klar »

The White Hand: Whole Villages Roused
Hazard: Short-event

Playable on a hero [-me_bh-] , or [-me_fh-] . The site has the automatic-attacks indicated on the corresponding minion site card (detainment against hero companies) but with +2 prowess. Alternatively, playable on a minion [-me_sh-] or [-me_dh-] . The site has the automatic-attacks indicated on the corresponding hero site card (detainment against overt companies) but with +2 prowess.
Do the phrases "(detainment against hero companies)", "(detainment against overt companies)" add detainment status to the attacks, or replace existing?

In first case it would createin many times an automatic-attacks at [-me_bh-] or [-me_bh-] that are detainment both against hero and against covert companies. So detainment against any type of company that may be at/move to the site.
We will not speak of such things even in the morning of the Shire.

User avatar
Theo
Posts: 1009
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2018 5:49 pm
Location: Denver, CO

Re: Whole Villages Roused and detainment status

Post by Theo »

I read it more as adding detainment.
It is not our part here to take thought only for a season, or for a few lives of Men, or for a passing age of the world.
One [online community] with hammer and chisel might mar more than they make... Cautious skill!

Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”