Council of Elrond

MELE Rulesbook wrote:REMOVING CORRUPTION CARDS
A character may choose to ignore the restriction that he tap to remove a corruption card (as printed on a corruption card), and suffer a -3 penalty to the dice roll to remove it. This means a character can remain untapped and still attempt to remove a corruption card (the roll is modified by -3), or that he can attempt to remove a corruption card even if he is already tapped or wounded (the roll is modified by -3).
Each turn, a character may only make one removal attempt for each corruption card if he uses the -3 modifier.

Dragons, Removing Corruption Cards wrote:A character may choose to ignore the restriction that he tap to remove a corruption
card (as printed on a corruption card), and suffer a -3 penalty to the dice roll to
remove it. This means a character can remain untapped and still attempt to remove a
corruption card (the roll is modified by -3), or that he can attempt to remove a
corruption card even if he is already tapped or wounded (the roll is modified by -3).
A character may only attempt to remove each corruption card once per turn if he
ignores the tapping restriction to do so.
Example: During his organization phase, Beorn has 3 corruption cards: Lure of
Nature, Lure of Expedience, and Lure of the Senses. He taps and rolls to attempt to
remove the Lure of the Senses; his roll is an 8, so the card is removed (greater than 6
was required). If, instead, Beorn had not tapped for this attempt, he would have failed
(he would have needed to roll a 10 or better). He then rolls to attempt to remove Lure
of Nature; his roll is a 6 modified by -3 for a net result of 3, so the card is not removed
(greater than 4 was required).
Finally, he rolls to attempt to remove Lure of Expedience; his roll is a 9 modified by
-3 for a net result of 6, so the card is removed (greater than 5 was required).