Page 1 of 1
Agenda Item 2009/10: Updated Webpage
Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 12:41 pm
by marcos
I suggest we update the CoE
webpage or make a completely new one (with updated info)
Thoughts?
Re: Agenda Item 2009/10: Updated Webpage
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 8:40 am
by Alter Tuk
Oh yes. We should either update the news from time to time or just make general statements that stay up to date. Who is the webmaster?
Re: Agenda Item 2009/10: Updated Webpage
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 1:23 pm
by marcos
is it M. Alfano?
or maybe the other admins from this forum, Steffen Lutter or Josh Hunholz?
Re: Agenda Item 2009/10: Updated Webpage
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 1:34 pm
by thorondor
all of the names should have access to the boards and be able to make changes. i recommend to contact steffen, usually he is very quick.
problem is, we never had a COE webmaster within the COE. the ressources of josh and mark seem to be very limited, and steffen is willing to do some work when asked.
Re: Agenda Item 2009/10: Updated Webpage
Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 1:23 pm
by Thorsten the Traveller
Personally I don't see why the CoE website should be renewed, updated sure but it seems generally okay still to me. Anything specific you're missing on it, Marcos? do you find it looks outdated?
I guess general admin status for CoE members is not bad in itself, but a single webmaster is better. If we don't assign this to a CoE member, Steffen does good work for this board and is always quick to reply, in fact it's better to have a non-member do it, to pool resources and assure more continuity. Just submit a text to him and it should work out fine, or do we suspect changes in the CoE page on a daily basis?
Re: Agenda Item 2009/10: Updated Webpage
Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 1:35 pm
by marcos
Thorsten the Traveller wrote:Personally I don't see why the CoE website should be renewed, updated sure but it seems generally okay still to me. Anything specific you're missing on it, Marcos? do you find it looks outdated?
I guess general admin status for CoE members is not bad in itself, but a single webmaster is better. If we don't assign this to a CoE member, Steffen does good work for this board and is always quick to reply, in fact it's better to have a non-member do it, to pool resources and assure more continuity. Just submit a text to him and it should work out fine, or do we suspect changes in the CoE page on a daily basis?
I just find it outdated, yes.
"News" talks about worlds 2009 in Barcelona, current members are out of date as well, major decisions don't mention anything about the proxy rule and the removal of the qualifier round at worlds and projects don't mention anything about ARDA. That is what i could find so far.