Doesn't this follow the old "active conditions" rules? It tells you what it's playable on, but then it gives you a further set of conditions which must be met. Similar to how "Ready to His Will" requires the tapping of a character to fulfill the cancelling of the attack.

If you've got the time, then yeah, why not. Otherwise it might be better just to spend whatever time we do have on making sure the v cards on GCCG are the most up to date.

"Character must stay at its current non-Haven site..." implies that a) the character is at a site and b) the site is non-Haven. So in answer to your questions I would say: 1. Yes. 2. You could not play this on a character who is moving during the m/h phase. You could however, play it durin...

Re those cards: Tower Raided: Like Thorsten, I not a fan of the arbitrary prowess boost. I'd rather see some other mechanism like perhaps reducing prowess or strikes of applicable ctreature attacks (e.g. orcs and trolls) or just making the effects applicable to automatic attacks (since it is Tower R...

Yes, as shapeshifter said.

Perhaps yes, but the simple fact of the matter is if the Balrog always has a body of 9, there will rarely be any of the deliberate confrontations which can make for exciting play. Unlike the Nazgul which can be killed by women, the Balrog doesn't have any innate weakness. Sometimes the promise of a ...

Is there any? For instance, game reports, card imbalances, card corrections, etc?

Barring the xml file, I have the set in a state ready for wigy, but was wanting to check first if there were any issues raised at Worlds.

Best,

I also really like the Balrog with a body value UEP, but this could be done in a much more attractive and interesting fashion with a VC. For instance, what about virtualising one of those underused Spawn cards? Think up a cool new ability and then add the Balrog having a body as a small secondary ef...

The reason why UEPs have not been incorporate into VCs as default is because of exactly what's happened in this thread. Everyone has a list of UEPs they like and those that they dislike, and in that sense, getting a consensus over agreed 'modifications' is more trouble than it's worth. VCs are diffe...

Voted No.

The power of virtual cards in what they can bring to the game means there's no real need for UEPs. UEPs were designed as unofficial errata for the normal rules. Virtual cards can do anything UEPs can do and then some. Just look at the <Ringwraith> Unleashed cards for a good example.

My Worlds Report I saw the new Batman movie, met a lot friends, stayed up late and got drunk (I was drinking beer even in the finals). I'd tell more about it but I can't recall. Good times! As we say in Finland: "Kuolema kuittaa univelat." 8) Hehe :thumbsup: That's prob what mine would've...

Is it at all possible that this version of Swag will make Come By Night Upon them redundant?

I suppose that has often puzzled many people. But maybe two orc-leaders in a company just doesn't match, they pick fights over nothing, and a troll is more dominant so the other guy keeps his mouth shut... True but then the Balrog's version doesn't distinguish and has this option... It might bring ...

Very simple, but I can't think how times I've wanted to design a regular minion deck around a pack of Orcs. e.g. Shagrat and Gorbag. :) [v] Orders from Lugburz Playable on a company. May be played with a starting company in lieu of a minor item. This company may contain an Orc leader in addition to ...

I've been using Ent-draughts in my Gimli and Legolas deck, so I'd rather it didn't go. I would like to see the impact of the new Open to the Summons and Swag's nice but can we say for sure it won't imbalance the Hog? If I had to pick I would suggest Fair Sailing, simply because right now coastal dec...