Search found 42 matches
- Tue Sep 25, 2012 2:20 am
- Forum: CoE Rules & Errata Community Proposals
- Topic: CoE Erratum Proposal 1
- Replies: 19
- Views: 22572
Re: #CoE Erratum Proposal 1
When I saw this mentioned in Wolfgang's newsletter, I expected something more significant. I forgot how deliberate and conservative the fan base is. Like Gimli describes working in the Glittering Caves of Aglarond: "With cautious skill, tap by tap - a small chip of rock and no more, perhaps, in...
- Tue Feb 05, 2008 4:31 am
- Forum: Rules and Rulings - NetRep Discussion Forum
- Topic: Formal Resignation
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2234
Formal Resignation
As you guys probably noticed on my other post in the General forum, I'm officially withdrawing from all my MECCG responsibilities. I pretty much said there what I want to say, so I'll just say goodbye and best of luck.
Chad
Chad
- Tue Feb 05, 2008 4:28 am
- Forum: Odds, Ends & Hobbit Holes
- Topic: Passing the torch (again)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2851
Passing the torch (again)
Due to my failing to keep up even a modicum of activity with the Council of Lorien, I have offered the job to Josh Hunholz, and he accepted. Josh has been a great help with some events I have run in the past, and knows the ropes. I expect the transition will be smooth, and I'm sure Josh will be more...
- Wed May 23, 2007 12:48 am
- Forum: Rules and Rulings - NetRep Discussion Forum
- Topic: Influence check vs. influence attempt (Flatter a Foe)
- Replies: 26
- Views: 21580
- Mon Apr 09, 2007 12:09 am
- Forum: Rules and Rulings - NetRep Discussion Forum
- Topic: Ready to His Will (again...)
- Replies: 36
- Views: 15579
- Sun Apr 08, 2007 11:59 pm
- Forum: Rules and Rulings - NetRep Discussion Forum
- Topic: Webs and Influencing Away
- Replies: 36
- Views: 28375
The only argument I have is that we've done this before when cards are clearly broken. One interpretation is reasonable. The other means you'll be changing the metagame dramatically, and probably for the worse. The game will become one where nobody carries items, they just get them and store them. Y...
- Sun Apr 08, 2007 11:50 pm
- Forum: Rules and Rulings - NetRep Discussion Forum
- Topic: Pilfer and targets
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2884
- Thu Mar 22, 2007 1:16 am
- Forum: Rules and Rulings - NetRep Discussion Forum
- Topic: Webs and Influencing Away
- Replies: 36
- Views: 28375
- Tue Mar 20, 2007 7:35 am
- Forum: Rules and Rulings - NetRep Discussion Forum
- Topic: About cards playable on Attacks/Automatic-attacks
- Replies: 19
- Views: 9771
I am extremely hesitant to agree with overturning rulings because the NetRep doesn't like how something works. There's a lot of holes and weirdness in the rules and cards. If we start issuing rulings like this, where does it end? From the beginning of the CoE, the NetRep has been charged with clarif...
- Tue Mar 20, 2007 7:28 am
- Forum: Odds, Ends & Hobbit Holes
- Topic: Voting is open for the 2007 Council of Elrond
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4969
2007 Election Results
There were 67 voters that cast 322 total votes. Joining next session's chair Josh Hunholz as your new members of the Council of Elrond and their vote totals are: Wolfgang Penetsdorfer: 55 Mark Alfano: 49 Joe Bisz: 40 Manuel CabezalÃ: 40 Piotr RzeÅ„ca: 39 Bert Claessen: 31 Stefan Fankel: 25 Kris Van...
- Sun Mar 18, 2007 9:10 am
- Forum: Odds, Ends & Hobbit Holes
- Topic: Voting is open for the 2007 Council of Elrond
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4969
Bruno de Lucia is withdrawing
Bruno de Lucia is withdrawing from the elections for the Council of Elrond. Though this does not change the end date and time of the elections, if those who have voted for Bruno wish to change their vote, they can do so by emailing the registrar. Dear MECCGers, I'm sorry to announce my withdrawal fr...
- Sat Mar 10, 2007 6:55 pm
- Forum: Rules and Rulings - NetRep Discussion Forum
- Topic: Action as Passive Condition
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4908
- Wed Mar 07, 2007 2:29 pm
- Forum: Rules and Rulings - NetRep Discussion Forum
- Topic: [OT] Questions from the old NetRep Board
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3892
- Wed Mar 07, 2007 2:25 pm
- Forum: Rules and Rulings - NetRep Discussion Forum
- Topic: Action as Passive Condition
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4908
Konrad, is there anyway that the corruption check from DotH ever get triggered under your interpretation? I think the issue here is not an incorrect definition of passive conditions in the CRF, but an overly literal reading of DotH. I would rather issue a ruling on DotH to clarify how that one card ...
- Wed Mar 07, 2007 2:20 pm
- Forum: Rules and Rulings - NetRep Discussion Forum
- Topic: Orders from Lugburz vs. Company Composition Rules
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3643