https://councilofelrond.org/

Because it's nice to have a direct link when talking about a web page...

I found it could be obtained via the url posted above. Github initially gave an error message "Unable to render code block" but if you ignore that and click on the "Download raw file" icon it does eventually present the downloaded pdf file. Takes a few seconds of waiting though....

Yes. It doesn't work. GIthub tries to display the pdf, not provide a download. You probably need to clone the repo to get the actual file. I've now done that. I have not read the document but skimmed it. It certainly looks really great. Well laid out, use of artwork is nice (although the full page o...

Bump for update.

Right, I knew that...

I've pm'd you. Thanks for the details!

I don't have a fb account. How much is he asking as does he have an email address or something shown? I'd probably try to buy one but it's not worth getting a fb account for...

I think this is not an errata but just putting the rulings and clarifications on the card. I don't think that's a good idea. The new text reads like it should be in the CRF under The Balance Of Things entry instead. It's not really changing anything. Unless you are printing us new cards, totally rew...

Updated after a few trades.
Ginger Dwarf and Whitesorcer, Thanks!

Oops... I'm looking for crept along _carefully_, not _cleverly_ from MEBA. Fixed.

Bump!

I guess we can agree to disagree. I don't see any ambiguity, sorry.

In short: a card with two uses that is only removed from game in result of alternative use is not possible? What should be a text of such card and how it would be formatted? As I've said before, it would be formatted exactly like Deeper shadow. There is one paragraph for the first effect and second...

Ech... then 3rd sentence is not treated in the same way as 1st and 2nd. It _is_ treated the same. First sentence applies to playing the card. 2nd sentence applies to playing the card. 3rd sentence applies to playing the card. Exactly the same. The fact that the 2nd one say "Alternatively"...

@ Konrad: The point is simply that the use of paragraphs is arbitrary. There is no reason to assume deliberate function in one instance of paragraphing when most if not all others show no sign of such. Hhm... that is not what I was saying. I think the use of paragraphs (and by that I mean newline +...

So not really that much of a mess really. And pretty consistent :) Not much. Only Deeper Shadow and Echoes of the Song. Or even not they, if it is intended that the last sentence of their texts applies only to alternative effect. :) I agree and said why I think Deeper applies only to the alternativ...