No disagreements there based on the premise, which seems to imply that "to allow him to face a strike from an attack" is synonymous with "to allow him to be assigned a strike from the attack".Konrad Klar wrote: ↑Sun Feb 09, 2020 7:11 am The phrase has meaning if Bow of Alatar does not allow for reassigning (already assigned) strike, but only changes of order of assigning strikes.
Then it sets a priority of Bow of Alatar's effect below "always" or "in all cases" effects and above attackʹs normal capabilities and normal rules of assigning strikes (that take care about untapped, tapped, wounded status).
But tell me, how do you explain Many Foes He Fought using two different phrases for what are synonymous?
Why wouldn't the card use at least self-consistent language, unless "choosing to be the target of a strike" and "choosing to face a strike" were meant to be different concepts?If defender chooses a warrior to be the target of a strike from an attack, that character may choose to face any number of the strikes from that attack.