Homecoming....
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 6:01 pm
So here we are, the JCP where it belongs: at the CoE website.
Nothing special to put in this announcement yet, except the list of current judges:
This is the complete list of judges; if you're a judge, your name should be on here. If you're not, it shouldn't. If you're working on advancement (either to an upper level or just to level 1), your name will not show up in the rank you're working towards. In other words, if you're trying to get to level 3, then your name will show up in level 2. If you're working towards level 1, your name simply won't be here (yet).
Please alert me to any errors in this list.
Level 1:
Dave Barton
Kris Van Beurden
Brian Min
Joe Bisz
Jonathan Yost
Kuba Krchak
Level 2:
Manuel Cabezali
Level 3:
NONE
Level 4:
Mark Alfano
Travis Took
Chad Martin
Nigel Buckle
Mikko Vihtehmaki
Level 5:
NONE
* Note: Wim Heemskerk is no longer a Level 4 Judge due to his claim to be hoarding rules and rulings in secret. If the claim is true, he is not to be trusted. If the claim is false, he is likewise not to be trusted. Hence, he is not to be trusted for rules or rulings information in future.
Nothing special to put in this announcement yet, except the list of current judges:
This is the complete list of judges; if you're a judge, your name should be on here. If you're not, it shouldn't. If you're working on advancement (either to an upper level or just to level 1), your name will not show up in the rank you're working towards. In other words, if you're trying to get to level 3, then your name will show up in level 2. If you're working towards level 1, your name simply won't be here (yet).
Please alert me to any errors in this list.
Level 1:
Dave Barton
Kris Van Beurden
Brian Min
Joe Bisz
Jonathan Yost
Kuba Krchak
Level 2:
Manuel Cabezali
Level 3:
NONE
Level 4:
Mark Alfano
Travis Took
Chad Martin
Nigel Buckle
Mikko Vihtehmaki
Level 5:
NONE
* Note: Wim Heemskerk is no longer a Level 4 Judge due to his claim to be hoarding rules and rulings in secret. If the claim is true, he is not to be trusted. If the claim is false, he is likewise not to be trusted. Hence, he is not to be trusted for rules or rulings information in future.