Why Gollum and Stinker are not Hobbits, while My Precious is Hobbit?
Maybe Gollum and Stinker should not be Hobbits?
Search found 4345 matches
- Mon Dec 18, 2023 9:59 pm
- Forum: Drafts
- Topic: Draft of CoE Digest #203 Q4 - Extension to the list of allies that make a company overt - Open until January 22
- Replies: 4
- Views: 568
- Fri Dec 15, 2023 3:20 pm
- Forum: Council Business
- Topic: User banned
- Replies: 19
- Views: 2472
Re: User banned
A sense of established law is that there are prohibitions and warrants. If I signed a contract with ISP, both my freedom and freedom of the ISP is reduced. I must pay for the service by time of the contract and the ISP must provide the service by the same time. No one is forced to be member of the f...
- Fri Dec 08, 2023 12:33 pm
- Forum: Council Business
- Topic: User banned
- Replies: 19
- Views: 2472
Re: User banned
If all cases would be as "2+2=4" then the courts would not be needed. Scheme "police report - eventual report of forensic laboratory - sentence" would be sufficient. Moderators must me subjective or otherwise they will be paralyzed. Like judges, they should work in some constrain...
- Mon Dec 04, 2023 9:47 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Comprehensive Rules
- Replies: 5
- Views: 496
- Mon Nov 27, 2023 9:14 am
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Siege vs eagle mount
- Replies: 2
- Views: 484
- Sat Nov 25, 2023 12:27 am
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Active conditions of effect of Black Arrow
- Replies: 21
- Views: 1095
Re: Active conditions of effect of Black Arrow
Also it's not that a non-Man can't bear it; just that they can't use it. So a non-Man could e.g. pick up a Black Arrow as an additional minor item during Site Phase and then transfer it to a Man during Org Phase who could then use it. I said about a card with effect "Man bearer only". Swo...
- Wed Nov 22, 2023 8:07 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Active conditions of effect of Black Arrow
- Replies: 21
- Views: 1095
Re: Active conditions of effect of Black Arrow
My understanding is that generally it's not considered "simultaneous" as much as "immediately next", though I think in practice that distinction doesn't really matter. I think that it's not considered "simultaneous" too. I think that in practice that distinction matter...
- Wed Nov 22, 2023 5:30 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Active conditions of effect of Black Arrow
- Replies: 21
- Views: 1095
Re: Active conditions of effect of Black Arrow
Thanks. Actual question was about "next opportunity". When character is discarded in result of cc caused by Weariness of the Heart, Fellowship on his former company is discarded exactly at the moment when the cc fails. Right? When character is discarded in result of cc caused by using of T...
- Wed Nov 22, 2023 7:37 am
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Active conditions of effect of Black Arrow
- Replies: 21
- Views: 1095
Re: Active conditions of effect of Black Arrow
The passive condition of Black Arrow being tapped then comes into effect and Black Arrow must be immediately discarded at the next opportunity, prior to the opponent having a chance to take their own action in response. What is "the next opportunity"? If Slip Treacherously is resolved, ex...
- Thu Nov 16, 2023 8:25 am
- Forum: Drafts
- Topic: Draft of CoE Digest #202 Q4 - Await the Advent of Allies
- Replies: 6
- Views: 692
Re: Draft of CoE Digest #202 Q4 - Await the Advent of Allies
I think while you are planning an overhaul errata, it could be helpful to clarify what "requires the site" means. I believe CDavis had a theory that anything that requires a character necessarily is played at (requires) the site because the characters require a site unless they are moving...
- Wed Nov 15, 2023 6:32 am
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Fireworks - exactly how does this card work?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 450
- Mon Nov 13, 2023 4:28 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Fireworks - exactly how does this card work?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 450
- Tue Oct 31, 2023 5:25 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Reluctant Final Parting - where Quickbeam may be played?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 464
Re: Reluctant Final Parting - where Quickbeam may be played?
Or use words with caution. Items, factions, also may be played at some site not being playable at the site and may be playable at some site and at the same site may not be played at the site. What would change a changing "playable at" to "Home Site" for the resources, except intr...
- Tue Oct 31, 2023 2:11 am
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Fireworks - exactly how does this card work?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 450
Re: Fireworks - exactly how does this card work?
Even something as simple as a line break before the last sentence would clarify the intent a lot but that is an observation that comes almost 30 years too late. I would wish a consistency with using paragraphs. Fireworks does not have alternative uses. It also does not have any forks (paths of exec...
- Mon Oct 30, 2023 11:59 am
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Fireworks - exactly how does this card work?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 450
Re: Fireworks - exactly how does this card work?
OR, does it mean that, success or fail, next turn he doesn't untap and Fireworks goes away? Next time when sage would otherwise become untapped. For Call of Home "Any one item held by the removed character" may be transferred, so if roll fails there is no possibility of transfer. For The ...