1. The sense of adding of "if played on‐guard, this card may be revealed when a company containing a character with at least one corruption source attempts to a play a resource that would tap the site." is like adding of "if placed on‐guard, this card may be revealed when a company co...

Essentially the same story (and the same disagreement) as for ". Additionally, any sage at a site in a Dark-domain or Gorgoroth, or moving with a [-me_dd-] or Gorgoroth in his site path, loses his sage skill." in text of In the Heart of his Realm. Some state may be a result of action cause...

Essentially the same story (and the same disagreement) as for ". Additionally, any sage at a site in a Dark-domain or Gorgoroth, or moving with a [-me_dd-] or Gorgoroth in his site path, loses his sage skill." in text of In the Heart of his Realm. Some state may be a result of action cause...

1. There is no end of turn if that turn is not proceeded.
2. One turn skipped to discard one card.
3. Yes (there are examples of other cards that may appear in play without being played).

1. In complex systems it is to expect that some elements will meet other elements and will create unusual interaction. Parsimony of Seclusion and Dragon factions. Peculiarity of Crown of Flowers that allows to discard (along with the card) other cards, otherwise hard or impossible to discard. Caramb...

I think that text: "Instead of a minor item you are allowed to play from your hand at a Border‐hold [ ], Free‐hold [ ], or Haven [ ], you may play an item from under Armory." would allow to play hoard items at sites that do not contain a hoard. Actual text is: "When you otherwise woul...

The rules clearly state that Major Items must be played at a site that list Major Items as playable. Necklace of Girion overturns this. Necklace of Girion also overturns the rule that Hoard Items must be played at Hoard Sites. I would say: normally major items may be played only at a site where maj...

Major Items are not Special Items. There absolutely *is* a correct site for playing major items. I did not say about "major items" in general, nor about "items" in general. I did say about items that are not played at a site. Item played in result of discarding of Necklace of Gi...

(Now that I think about it, Necklace allows the play of major items even if not at the correct site to play major items. There is no "correct site to play major items" if the items are not played at a site. Likewise there is no "correct site" for playing of a ring special item. ...

@dirhaval If unique card would be under Armory it would be strange if its other copy would be in play. I do not know, why I did not think about this before, but: I know why I did not think about this before. :? Even if a character is not able to bear some item, it does not mean that he may not make ...

1. In addition.
2. Yes.

I do not know, why I did not think about this before, but: if a character bears Elven Cloak and tries to play minor item at [-me_ha-] , or at [-me_fh-], or at [-me_bh-], can he play Elven Cloak from under Armory? If "When you otherwise would be allowed to play a minor item from your hand at a B...

"Randomized" does not mean "evenly distributed".
For some friendly group of players in Poland in 90' actually rare card was Marvels Told and most common was hero Dunharrow.
Personally I am under impression that there are rare Uncommons - Bridge, The Old Thrush, Ancient Stair.

If you want to continue a discussion from archived thread, then open a new topic in appropriate section of forum and quote the text of your interest or make link to the archived thread.

I agree with example of Miruvor. Affected object should be so described that it would have a chance to be valid both at declaration and at resolution. E.g. "company of bearer/former bearer of X". For Sacrifice of Form: if someone maintains that discarding of Wizard is condition, not main e...