Search found 1393 matches
- Wed Sep 13, 2023 3:36 pm
- Forum: Decks, Strategy, Tips, Ideas
- Topic: Sites without "Playable" option
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1117
Re: Sites without "Playable" option
Additionally, every site can be used for company vs. company combat, counter influence attempts, or agent movement. Minions also have a few permanent-events that are playable at generic Border-holds that have no other stuff.
- Fri Aug 25, 2023 7:21 pm
- Forum: Drafts
- Topic: Draft of CoE Digest #200 Q8 - Flatter a Foe + Foolish Words - Open until August 27th
- Replies: 6
- Views: 720
Re: Draft of CoE Digest #200 Q8 - Flatter a Foe + Foolish Words - Open until August 27th
I will only add that this distinction between influence attempt and influence check has greater implications if they were to be made synonymous (e.g., Lure of Power). At least there is this very old ruling: >7. Is an "Influence Check" indicating an Influence Attempt automatically? So... is...
- Fri Aug 25, 2023 6:41 pm
- Forum: Drafts
- Topic: Draft of CoE Digest #200 Q4 - Transferring items - Open until August 27th
- Replies: 2
- Views: 432
Re: Draft of CoE Digest #200 Q4 - Transferring items - Open until August 27th
I am in agreement with this ruling. I would advocate for it being labeled as a clarification rather than an errata to the The Balrog and Challenge Decks rules summaries. A summary necessarily touches main points while simplifying details. Erratum list and correct an errors in printing, and in this s...
- Fri Aug 25, 2023 4:39 pm
- Forum: Drafts
- Topic: Draft of CoE Digest #200 Q12 - Half-orcs and covert companies when playing FW - Open until August 27th
- Replies: 6
- Views: 967
Re: Draft of CoE Digest #200 Q12 - Half-orcs and covert companies when playing FW - Open until August 27th
A company with Half-orcs + Men is not overt. First, I think this is a reasonable ruling to clarify a potentially ambiguous situation, the parsing of "a company with only Half-orcs and Men." In my opinion , the parsing that would be necessary to require a man to avoid being overt---groupin...
- Fri Aug 25, 2023 3:07 pm
- Forum: Cardnum
- Topic: Reporting the errors in card texts
- Replies: 99
- Views: 34917
- Tue Aug 22, 2023 4:52 pm
- Forum: Scenario Games
- Topic: Dissipate Darkness/Audacity -- A General Cooperative Variant
- Replies: 12
- Views: 6140
Re: Dissipate Darkness/Audacity -- A General Cooperative Variant
Updates: * reduce Darkness prowess penalty -- modifier is no longer cumulative, and ignored for large enough companies. I'll be interested in additional feedback as we find the right balance. * make OG have discard pile and count against hazard limit -- reduces shuffling and low-hazard-limit compani...
- Tue Jul 18, 2023 3:09 am
- Forum: Cardnum
- Topic: Reporting the errors in card texts
- Replies: 99
- Views: 34917
Re: Reporting the errors in card texts
Several instances of the hyphen being left out of "permanent-event":
All Nazgul cards
Morgul-horse
Shelob ("as a permanent event" is extraneous. Also missing period of first sentence.)
All Nazgul cards
Morgul-horse
Shelob ("as a permanent event" is extraneous. Also missing period of first sentence.)
- Thu Jul 13, 2023 5:54 pm
- Forum: Community Projects
- Topic: Tracking Player Performance
- Replies: 4
- Views: 800
Tracking Player Performance
Gist: The Council of Meduseld tracks player performance. ANY games can be incorporated. View standings at https://theo-donly.github.io/MECCG/#standings. CoM tracks participation and technical performance for all submitted games, as well as a traditional ICE ranking specifically for qualifying online...
- Wed Jul 12, 2023 10:46 pm
- Forum: USA MECCG Community
- Topic: Denver Regional Moot: August 19
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1038
Re: Denver Regional Moot: August 19
Updated original post with time and location details.
- Sat Jul 08, 2023 5:36 pm
- Forum: USA MECCG Community
- Topic: Denver Regional Moot: August 19
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1038
Denver Regional Moot: August 19
We've got a MECCG moot planned for Saturday, August 19. This will likely be our biggest since (or even before?) COVID, hopefully pulling in some players from various areas around Denver and some folks from out of state. PM me here or on Discord if you might be interested! We'll be roughly aiming for...
- Mon Jun 05, 2023 8:02 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Target vs. condition - potential conflict
- Replies: 11
- Views: 761
Re: Target vs. condition - potential conflict
Can you give me a use case? Wizard's Test on Bright Gold Ring by hero player. So the example is: Wizard makes corruption check to be able to get rid of one pesky card in hand and be allowed to tap characters to support in response? I'm perfectly ok with allowing my opponent to do this if they made ...
- Mon Jun 05, 2023 7:56 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Target vs. condition - potential conflict
- Replies: 11
- Views: 761
Re: Target vs. condition - potential conflict
Sacrifice of Form by hero player if Wizard is possessing minion items. I was saving this "use case" for purpose of other topic. I would say that the use case is legal. Why it is legal I will try to explain in said topic. But I am curious about your (and other's) opinion. Thanks, I like th...
- Mon Jun 05, 2023 7:51 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Target vs. condition - potential conflict
- Replies: 11
- Views: 761
Re: Target vs. condition - potential conflict
Of course Driven as by a Madness does not target the allies and Messenger of Mordor does not target the items. But both are affecting them that is forbidden for non-Spells non-Magic events of opposite alignment (for FW player at least). I would think that allies counting as characters for combat (a...
- Mon Jun 05, 2023 7:31 pm
- Forum: Council Business
- Topic: This forum looks so good
- Replies: 27
- Views: 2014
Re: This forum looks so good
Could this thread be moved into a main channel? As far as I know it is still up-to-date and relevant; no other place on CoE has the Balrog/CD reprint wording.
viewtopic.php?f=68&t=3325
- Mon Jun 05, 2023 5:55 pm
- Forum: Middle-earth
- Topic: First announcement and development progress
- Replies: 33
- Views: 2812
Re: New Platform for Playing: MeCCG Online
As you know, I'm very excited for this and the possibility of merging the GCCG, cardnum, and TTS players (and Mellon and OCTGN... not sure if anyone uses those and not the others though). Thanks for your efforts.
When can we test?
When can we test?