These are the precedents I know of:
- The CoE charter: http://www.councilofelrond.org/forum/vi ... it=charter
- The first errata issued: http://www.councilofelrond.org/forum/vi ... 103&t=1976
Search found 234 matches
- Fri Mar 24, 2017 7:59 am
- Forum: Completed Agenda Items
- Topic: Methodology for passing motions....
- Replies: 4
- Views: 6882
- Thu Mar 23, 2017 3:22 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Declaring movement to a site in play
- Replies: 45
- Views: 18559
Re: Declaring movement to a site in play
I would say you don't have to declare which site until: 1) The company attempts to move there; or 2) The site would otherwise be removed. According to that interpretation, if you keep a site in play that would be discarted/returned to the site deck, it must me a site you go with other company. Righ...
- Wed Mar 22, 2017 7:45 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Declaring movement to a site in play
- Replies: 45
- Views: 18559
Declaring movement to a site in play
I've always played (and I've always seen it played the same way) that when you declare movement to a site already in play, you don't have to specify which of the sites already in play you're going to move to, until that company's movement/hazard phase. MELE Rulebook During the organization phase, tw...
- Wed Mar 22, 2017 7:21 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Meaning of moving during organizations phase
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3240
Meaning of moving during organizations phase
HIDDEN WAYS Ranger only. Playable during the organization phase on an untapped ranger whose company is moving. Tap the ranger. No hazard creatures may be keyed by type to Wilderness against the rangerʹs company this turn. HIDE IN DARK PLACES Scout only. Playable during the organization phase on a s...
Re: Images
I just wrote one in Spanish here:
http://www.meccg.es/foro/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=5195
I'll translate it and post it in this forum.
http://www.meccg.es/foro/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=5195
I'll translate it and post it in this forum.
- Tue Mar 21, 2017 10:35 am
- Forum: Completed Agenda Items
- Topic: CoE session 2017 Agenda
- Replies: 14
- Views: 11245
Re: CoE session 2017 Agenda
I support Gavin for chair too. My main interest lies in fixing loopholes in the rules and cards that doesn't work as intented. So I definitely want to be in the rules committee. I'm not sure about the difference between Game Promoting and Public Relations. FWIW, I'm being very vocal in the Spanish c...
- Sat Mar 18, 2017 1:08 am
- Forum: Completed Agenda Items
- Topic: CoE session 2017 Agenda
- Replies: 14
- Views: 11245
Re: CoE session 2017 Agenda
I won't run for chairman.
- Sun Mar 12, 2017 9:54 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Freeze the flesh
- Replies: 27
- Views: 10224
Re: Freeze the flesh
I like Konrad's proposal. I dislike the notion that cards keep any kind of "status" when they leave play.
- Sun Mar 12, 2017 9:08 pm
- Forum: Council Business
- Topic: Council of Elrond elections 2016
- Replies: 10
- Views: 13303
Re: Council of Elrond elections 2016
I'm a bit late to this train. Thankfully the Lure awakened me from my slumber. I'd like to help and this is my short agenda: - Completing the already extense Spanish edition errata (http://www.meccg.es/foro/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=5095). This is a personal project. - Informing the Spanish community ...
- Sun Mar 12, 2017 8:53 pm
- Forum: CoE Rules & Errata Community Proposals
- Topic: Erratum Proposal: The One Ring
- Replies: 3
- Views: 6200
Re: Erratum Proposal: The One Ring
This is the real errata that The One Ring needs.Khamul the Easterling wrote:Anyway, I propose that the text be changed by inserting "against himself" at the end of the lines cited above.
- Sat Oct 08, 2016 1:58 pm
- Forum: Council Business
- Topic: CoE Elections 2016 bis [announcement]
- Replies: 3
- Views: 7891
Re: CoE Elections 2016
My intention is to be more active in this forum. I'd like to see more errata/clarifications issued by the coe/netrep.
- Sat Oct 08, 2016 1:40 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Gwaihir
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4671
Re: Gwaihir
Does Eagle-Mounts work the same way?
- Sat Oct 08, 2016 1:37 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Snaga-hai
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3119
Re: Snaga-hai
I don't know if this is relevant:
Annotation 1: A card is not in play until it is resolved in its chain of effects.
- Thu Aug 25, 2016 9:19 am
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Using items
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2110
Using items
This is an academic question: who can use an item?
- Wed Aug 24, 2016 6:35 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Gwaihir
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4671
Gwaihir
I need confirmation on this: Unique. Playable at Eagles' Eyrie. If his company's size is two or less, you may discard Gwaihir during the organization phase to allow his company to move to any site that is not in a Shadow-land [s] or Dark-domain [d]; only hazard creatures keyed to the site may be pla...