Search found 202 matches

by Khamul the Easterling
Thu Nov 28, 2019 7:11 pm
Forum: German MECCG Community
Topic: MECCG-Treffen in Hessen
Replies: 7
Views: 3511

Re: MECCG-Treffen in Hessen

Shapeshifter wrote:
Wed Nov 27, 2019 8:12 pm
Unsere Gruppe hat das Interesse der Presse erweckt:
https://www.wetterauer-zeitung.de/wette ... 50001.html

Hoffentlich gute Werbung! :D
Cool! :D
by Khamul the Easterling
Sat Nov 23, 2019 1:33 pm
Forum: The Marketplace
Topic: Agalon’s Haves and Wants (WTTF / FT) 08/11/2019
Replies: 2
Views: 440

Re: Agalon’s Haves and Wants (WTTF / FT) 08/11/2019

Did a nice trade with Agalon. Highly recommended!
by Khamul the Easterling
Sun Nov 03, 2019 8:09 pm
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Non-minion agents as creatures
Replies: 13
Views: 4534

Re: Non-minion agents as creatures

Vastor Peredhil wrote:
Sun Nov 03, 2019 8:15 am
so what about

Treason of Isengard: Baugúr
...
What, explicitly, is your question?
by Khamul the Easterling
Sat Nov 02, 2019 1:04 pm
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Non-minion agents as creatures
Replies: 13
Views: 4534

Re: Non-minion agents as creatures

Cheers!

One more thing to agree on:

Consequently, agents that do not count as 1/2 against the creature limit do count as characters, right? (They are not hazards counting 0 against the creature limit).
by Khamul the Easterling
Fri Nov 01, 2019 7:27 pm
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Non-minion agents as creatures
Replies: 13
Views: 4534

Re: Non-minion agents as creatures

... So perhaps my proposal also should include the amendment to MELE: - An agent (Wizard player only for minion agents ) I'd (mis)understand this proposal in such a way that for Wizard Players only minion agents do count as 1/2 a creature, but non-minion agents would not. That's why I'm asking for ...
by Khamul the Easterling
Sun Oct 27, 2019 6:32 pm
Forum: The Marketplace
Topic: Khamul's trade list (WTTF FT)
Replies: 6
Views: 5203

Re: Khamul's trade list (WTTF FT)

List has been updated
by Khamul the Easterling
Sat Sep 14, 2019 6:31 pm
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Fifteen Birds in Five Firtrees
Replies: 50
Views: 10433

Re: Fifteen Birds in Five Firtrees

That statement seems to be preventing Block from cancelling the tapping action after the strike resolves. Was that intended? I think Block should still prevent tapping when the character is under the effects of FBiFF. Yes, it would essentially mean Block is without an effect. I took over Konrad's a...
by Khamul the Easterling
Sat Sep 14, 2019 6:23 pm
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Icy Touch (errata + clarification)
Replies: 29
Views: 7618

Re: Icy Touch (errata + clarification)

How about making 2 proposals out of it? First: Clarification The prowess modification is cumulative if multiple copies of this card are played with an attack. Second: Erratum: Corruption. The next character wounded by the attack (on whom a corruption card has not already been played this turn) recei...
by Khamul the Easterling
Fri Sep 13, 2019 4:13 pm
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Fifteen Birds in Five Firtrees
Replies: 50
Views: 10433

Re: Fifteen Birds in Five Firtrees

Coming back to the point I made earlier I have the impression (or hope :) ) most of the users debating this submission can agree on: A character facing a strike from a subsequent creature must tap/may not opt to remain untapped/is tapped if untapped after the strike. The situation in case of Sable S...
by Khamul the Easterling
Sun Sep 08, 2019 7:07 am
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Icy Touch (errata + clarification)
Replies: 29
Views: 7618

Re: Icy Touch (errata + clarification)

... If a second or third card is in play, also the second or third character wounded by the attack (on whom a corruption card has not already been played this turn) receive 2 corruption points. ... I would not believe anyone misunderstanding how you want it to resolve, but I don't think this would ...
by Khamul the Easterling
Sat Sep 07, 2019 6:22 pm
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Fifteen Birds in Five Firtrees
Replies: 50
Views: 10433

Re: Fifteen Birds in Five Firtrees

2) "Block" can be played on an untapped character and he remains untapped after the strike's resolved. "Block" cannot be played on an untapped character. Playing "Block" is the attempt to avoid being tapped if untapped after the strike is resolved. I think this might be debatable. I would agree if ...
by Khamul the Easterling
Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:38 pm
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Icy Touch (errata + clarification)
Replies: 29
Views: 7618

Re: Icy Touch (errata + clarification)

I think it's a bit tricky that we have to different effects on the card: +1 prowess AND corruption Only the last effect has the restrictions for corruption cards / effects. Right, any suggestion concerning the submission proposal? == Here's a new try. Would you be ok to combine both proposals into ...
by Khamul the Easterling
Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:20 pm
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Fifteen Birds in Five Firtrees
Replies: 50
Views: 10433

Re: Fifteen Birds in Five Firtrees

OK, I'm trying to sum up, please have a look: 1) A character may not choose the option of taking a -3 modification and stay untapped (think we've all agreed on this so far) 2) "Block" can be played on an untapped character and he remains untapped after the strike's resolved. 3) An untapped character...
by Khamul the Easterling
Fri Sep 06, 2019 5:25 am
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Fifteen Birds in Five Firtrees
Replies: 50
Views: 10433

Re: Fifteen Birds in Five Firtrees

Konrad, as you said you wanted to stick to your last proposal, which I think is this one: "Playable on a moving company facing a non-unique hazard creature if Gates of Morning is in play. All attacks of the creature are canceled and all attacks of the next non-unique hazard creature the company face...
by Khamul the Easterling
Thu Sep 05, 2019 5:36 pm
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Fallen-wizards using characters with > 5 mind.
Replies: 33
Views: 10521

Re: Fallen-wizards using characters with > 5 mind.

Hi, I do not see the point." There are no other restrictions on characters based on their mind." This does not say anything about company restrictions that still have to be fulfilled. Only mind restrictions are deactivated once the character is in play. Cheers Heiner Exactly. This phrase is only cl...

Go to advanced search