Search found 3161 matches

by Konrad Klar
Tue Feb 25, 2020 6:40 am
Forum: Rules & Errata
Topic: Many Foes He Fought - revisited
Replies: 30
Views: 474

Re: Many Foes He Fought - revisited

Theo wrote:
Tue Feb 25, 2020 4:26 am
an unquantified pool of strikes from which individual "given strikes" are implicitly drawn and assigned to characters to face.
Totally yes.
by Konrad Klar
Tue Feb 25, 2020 6:31 am
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Clarification: Placing Corruption Cards
Replies: 21
Views: 4601

Re: Clarification: Placing Corruption Cards

Playing in CCG includes a playing of cards. It may include a shuffling of deck. Shuffling a deck does not include a playing of cards. P.S. Some extra MECCG specific sentence: "Declaration of corruption check from Lure of Nature does not include a playing card. At best it includes playing of corrupti...
by Konrad Klar
Mon Feb 24, 2020 5:43 pm
Forum: Rules & Errata
Topic: Beginning/end of phase and turn #2
Replies: 19
Views: 157

Re: Beginning/end of phase and turn #2

But the expression "at the beginning/end of the ____ phase" is limiting on purpose. It should have a limiting purpose. I do not want to change it. According to the proposal beginning/end of phase/turn is not a point but a period. Unlimited number of actions may be declared within the period, but wh...
by Konrad Klar
Mon Feb 24, 2020 8:50 am
Forum: Rules & Errata
Topic: Beginning/end of phase and turn #2
Replies: 19
Views: 157

Re: Beginning/end of phase and turn #2

CDavis7M wrote:
Mon Feb 24, 2020 6:24 am
What definition of "beginning" allows a later point in time to also be the "beginning"?
A definition of range. A range may contain infinite number of points.
If some period is considered as "beginning", the period contains infinite number of points in time, each belonging to "beginning".
by Konrad Klar
Mon Feb 24, 2020 8:41 am
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Clarification: Placing Corruption Cards
Replies: 21
Views: 4601

Re: Clarification: Placing Corruption Cards

Someone may use "playing of X" as synonymous of "declaring of X". No big problem until he makes implications like your. That declaring "placing of X" implies playing of X. No. Declaring of "placing/returning/discarding/storing of X" is not "playing of X"; it is at best "playing of placing/returning/...
by Konrad Klar
Mon Feb 24, 2020 8:22 am
Forum: Rules & Errata
Topic: Many Foes He Fought - revisited
Replies: 30
Views: 474

Re: Many Foes He Fought - revisited

Attacks that say "each character in the company faces one strike" do not even have any "given strikes" existing to assign! On what basis is it based? And what then Note: Ignore effects that modify the number of strikes for an attack that states that "every character in the target company faces one ...
by Konrad Klar
Sun Feb 23, 2020 4:32 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Stopping Nazgul Events / Praise to Elbereth - Supersedes the Timing Rules?
Replies: 9
Views: 100

Re: Stopping Nazgul Events / Praise to Elbereth - Supersedes the Timing Rules?

My previous last post is now "lost post". No big problem. Canceling a card looks odd at first glance. But an event in play may be perceived as a case of ongoing effect. But the perception cannot be translated on rules of the game. I must admit. Otherwise Searching Eye could be able to cancel Tower R...
by Konrad Klar
Sat Feb 22, 2020 8:45 am
Forum: Cardnum
Topic: Reporting the errors in card texts
Replies: 20
Views: 698

Re: Reporting the errors in card texts

Against the Shadow: Drughu Resource: Short-event Playable on a hero company during your orgazniation phase if you discard a ranger character from your hand. All characters in the company this turn receive +2 prowess against attacks keyed to [-me_wi-] and during combat at [-me_rl-] . "Each company w...
by Konrad Klar
Sat Feb 22, 2020 8:32 am
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Stopping Nazgul Events / Praise to Elbereth - Supersedes the Timing Rules?
Replies: 9
Views: 100

Re: Stopping Nazgul Events / Praise to Elbereth - Supersedes the Timing Rules?

After all, what Tom Bombadil does to the "effects of one hazard that targets a company, or an entity associated with a company"?
by Konrad Klar
Sat Feb 22, 2020 8:18 am
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Stopping Nazgul Events / Praise to Elbereth - Supersedes the Timing Rules?
Replies: 9
Views: 100

Re: Stopping Nazgul Events / Praise to Elbereth - Supersedes the Timing Rules?

... "non-on-going" :oops: A previously-resolved non-on-going effects cannot be canceled. I think that both effect of Drughu and effect of Clear Skies are ongoing effects. One is not represented by a card in play, other is represented by a card in play. Both may be permanently interrupted. Each by o...
by Konrad Klar
Fri Feb 21, 2020 8:43 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Rescue Prisoners
Replies: 5
Views: 1165

Re: Rescue Prisoners

Against the Shadow: Drughu Resource: Short-event Playable on a hero company during your organization phase if you discard a ranger character from your hand. All characters in the company this turn receive +2 prowess against attacks keyed to [-me_wi-] and during combat at [-me_rl-] . "Each company w...
by Konrad Klar
Fri Feb 21, 2020 8:16 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Stopping Nazgul Events / Praise to Elbereth - Supersedes the Timing Rules?
Replies: 9
Views: 100

Re: Stopping Nazgul Events / Praise to Elbereth - Supersedes the Timing Rules?

CDavis7M wrote:
Fri Feb 21, 2020 8:08 pm
... "non-on-going"
But stil enigmatic.
by Konrad Klar
Fri Feb 21, 2020 8:14 pm
Forum: 2018 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Beginning/end of phase and turn
Replies: 9
Views: 3621

Re: Beginning/end of phase and turn

Good luck with playing the Bridge. There is no problem playing Bridge. Depending on when an end of M/H phase is considered to happen. Annotation 25a: A company's movement/hazard phase is concluded when a moving company removes its site of origin and both players agree to reconcile (discard down to/...
by Konrad Klar
Fri Feb 21, 2020 7:30 pm
Forum: 2018 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Beginning/end of phase and turn
Replies: 9
Views: 3621

Re: Beginning/end of phase and turn

CDavis7M wrote:
Fri Feb 21, 2020 5:44 pm
Source of the image: IMGUR.com
Creator of the image: Me
So if it would be your proposal, not argument against mine, I would something to add.
Otherwise I am treating it as the same arguments that was presented earlier textually, presented now graphically.
Good luck with playing the Bridge.
by Konrad Klar
Fri Feb 21, 2020 7:14 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Stopping Nazgul Events / Praise to Elbereth - Supersedes the Timing Rules?
Replies: 9
Views: 100

Re: Stopping Nazgul Events / Praise to Elbereth - Supersedes the Timing Rules?

It's not obvious if the question is "can I play Ren and tap before before Ren is canceled by Praise to Elbereth". Because in this case, Ren as permanent event is targeted by Praise to Elbereth and it may not be tapped in response to its play because (A) Ren is not in play, it is just declared, not ...

Go to advanced search